Challenges
Technical and Global
After a little “briefing”, there will be an essay, but there have been some crises that I would like to address. We launched in January last year so many subscriptions recently came up for renewal and quite a number of the charges were disputed because the subscriber did not connect the dots. Substack uses Stripe as a payment gateway, and the identifier on your credit card bill will be iie-academy.org. The academy is associated with the Institute for Invisible Epidemics. There is a contact form on that site that is very easy to access, and this addresses another question people have asked about how to contact me:
https://invisibleepidemics.com/contact-the-institute/
When you hit reply, you clog my inbox so I would like to request that you use the form on the link above. I do respond to e-mail. In the meantime, may I also ask that you do not dispute the charges because they freeze the funds and deduct fees regardless of the outcome of the dispute. If this were happening once in a while, I would not mention anything but the disputes were numerous.
What paid subscriptions mean to me is that there is a trickle of income and encouragement for my efforts. At this time, it amounts to about $40 per post, not obviously enough to keep food on my plate, but income is appreciated. Subscribers can also make comments and ask questions, and we will be adding more features soon, for subscribers only. These will be live podcasts.
I apologize for taking your time with explanations about my challenges, another of which is that all e-commerce was disabled a few days ago due to expiry of a commitment. A replacement is being rolled out, but in the meantime, if you wish to place an order, please use the contact form and include the items, quantity, and shipping location. You will then be sent an invoice.
Our technician is working diligently to replace the system that has expired and your loyalty and patience are both greatly appreciated.
Comments on Recent Events
While many online astrologers put the emphasis on anticipated conflicts in February, I have chosen to concentrate on the surfacing of truth. However, the conjunction of Venus, Mars, and Pluto is definitely intense, and probably in most cases, highly personal . . . which is not to suggest that microcosm is not a reflection of the macrocosm. Relationships can be very uplifting and beautiful . . . and they can come with a lot of expectations regarding how needs will be met. I have been observing many people having a particularly rough go of things lately, but I truly believe there is reason for significant optimism . . . down the road a bit.
One example of Truth surfacing is the recent upload by Dan Willis:
A link was shared with my inner circle, but I don’t want to repeat all the details of the commentaries that followed. Suffice it to say that while I think this video is significant, it is not the final word much less anything close to the bigger picture.
Today is not the day for me to explain the rabbit hole that has been my mental home for the last many years, but it involves a combination of astronomy and geography and ideas that come and go as experts try to interpret their observations. When we try to sift through what is and is not a psyops, we have to consider what we were taught and how it tallies with what we observe. If we become obsessed, as I confess is the case with me, then we will keep delving into the details until we either give up or find what we were seeking.
Since I don’t have the answers, I will not indulge in speculations, but I might perhaps throw out a teaser saying I have serious questions about everything pertaining to the Moon. I do promise to explain this further . . . when the time is right, but for now, this is enough. The gauntlet is on the ground, and we will see if anyone picks it up.
Tucker Carlson and Vladimir Putin
Since heavy weights have commented, I do not expect my thoughts to be taken very seriously, but we are talking about two very experienced professionals who know the curriculum of their fields as well as how they will be perceived by others. No one can appear on camera so often without realizing that every wince and gesture will be noticed and interpreted. Most likely there were also agreements in place about what questions could and could not be asked . . . and perhaps even some rehearsals. In short, an interview of this much significance did not happen just because Tucker Carlson wanted to attend the Bolshoi Ballet in the dead of a Russian winter.
This said, going back to my Vietnam days, I was sent to the Paris Peace Talks with a portfolio, more or less the size of what Mr. Putin handed to Tucker Carlson. It was not chained to my arm, but it was not to be out of sight for even one second. Orly Airport was closed due to rioting so the straightest distance to Paris was off the table. My instructions were to enter the cockpit of the PanAm plane when it was over Tehran so the pilot could radio Tel Aviv about which plane to take from Tel Aviv to Europe. There were two diplomatic cars on the runway in Tel Aviv, and the embassy officials were still undecided about which plane to board for the next flight. It ended up that I would go to Frankfurt and then by road to Brussels where I would commandeer a diplomatic vehicle (special license plates and immunity) to proceed to Paris. I was in my mid-twenties and the excitement was palpable.
Since embassies have courier pouches, why did this particular portfolio have to be hand-carried? My understanding was that it contained photographic evidence of the use of the Ho Chi Minh Trail for moving troops and armaments. In short, Tucker Carlson was given documents of such a sensitive nature that they did not dare to transmit them even by diplomatic courier. Keep in mind that diplomats cannot be searched at the airport as they have immunity so the documents must be “explosive” . . . and Mr. Putin wants the information broadcasted. The fact that the documents were in Russian is typical protocol: the responsibility for correct translations is on the recipient though comparisons of translations can be made. The official version is however the one made by the recipient.
So far as the interview itself went, I did not think there is anything for me to add. Others have already commented; and some questions were handled quite cleverly, such as who blew up the Nord Stream Pipeline. The bottom line for me was thus not the theater of two high profile persons having a chat, but what is in the portfolio.
Stay tuned!
Copyright by Dr. Ingrid Naiman 2024 || All Rights Reserved
For permission to quote, please contact the author. Sharing via e-mail and posting links are welcome so long as the author and source are properly cited. Reprinting is strictly prohibited.