This post is intended to be an informal introduction to the history of frequencies and disease. The goal is to promote thinking, not to demonstrate the type of erudition seen in deeper studies.
Perhaps the place to start is with a debate that took place in Santa Fe, New Mexico, some decades ago. A world famous author and the head of the local utility company faced off. One study cited the fact that the incidence of childhood leukemia was ten times higher on the side of the street with telephone poles than the other side of the street. At the end, there was a vote, and the audience went 50-50 over who won . . . despite the fact that I personally believed that the studies cited were convincing.
Why would EMF affect health? It took me a number of years to answer the question. Early on in my now half century career, I felt that any disturbance might contribute to an error when cells are dividing. Since cancer at that time was usually described as an abnormal cell, any chemical or electromagnetic disturbance could conceivably affect cells. If this simple thesis were true, then children who are still growing would have a higher risk of cancer than adults. Moreover, the tissues in which cancer might develop would be those with a higher rate of replacement. To make this clear, the risk of liver cancer would be higher than the risk of cancer of nerve cells because liver cells are replaced, usually in under two years, whereas nerve cells last as long as the person lives.
Neutrophils, the white blood cells that help with tissue repair, are very fragile and may only live a day or two. Though the debate went 50-50 years ago, a quick search of the Internet suggests that exposure to radiation and toxins is today one of the recognized causes of childhood leukemia. I will argue that these types of exposures contribute to a wide range of illnesses in people and animals of all ages.
As mentioned, my education was far from complete at the midway point in my career. Once I developed a passion for darkfield microscopy, I realized that all forms of electromagnetic radiation cause microscopic perforations. The technical term is electromagnetic perforations. When a red blood cell is vastly magnified, one can see multiple holes in the cell. There is often some leakage as well. This, in turn, leads to dehydration of cell which causes a condition called crenation. Cells that are injured in this manner cannot perform their tasks so tissues will become oxygen and nutrient deficient. This is not a minor problem because repeated exposure can be very debilitating. With nuclear radiation, a single exposure is sometimes fatal so we should take this subject seriously and avoid exposure to the extent possible.
Because of some of the statements about vaccines and now Marburg disease, it seems appropriate to review a chapter in medical history that is often skipped by those in degree programs. Dr. Albert Abrams was born in San Francisco in the mid-19th century. He was phenomenally well-educated. He received his first medical degree in 1881, went on to Heidelberg University where he received a second medical degree. He studied in London, Berlin, Vienna, and Paris before returning to the U.S. where he received a third medical degree. He held teaching positions in pathology and later became Director of Medical Studies at Stanford University. In 1889, he was elected vice president of the California State Medical Society. By the turn of the century, his attention was more on neurology than pathology, and he published on spondylotherapy. The list of professional honors goes on and on, and Abrams ultimately became the father of radionics.
This is a complex topic so it would be better if those who are seriously interested studied the nuances. In the meantime, there are a few points to consider that will hopefully lay a foundation for a new perspective on what is sometimes referred to as energy medicine.
Perhaps in his capacity as a pathologist, Abrams identified unique characteristics of “all that ails us”. He went on to develop a very complex understanding of neurology that facilitated diagnosis. Then, as an inventor, he built equipment to correct signals. This is a very loose and inadequate way to summarize in a few words what he accomplished in a lifetime. Obviously, I do not mean any disrespect. I am simply choosing not to go into massive detail.
Modern Medicine
Many of us have been literally indoctrinated to believe that both science and medicine are revealing an ever deeper understanding of the structures and laws behind reality. What was missing in the curriculum I studied is that a decision was taken between World War I and World War II to put the emphasis on chemistry rather than electricity. What happens in situations like this is that the favored choice is funded and the other goes underground . . . where, as one physician once told me, “it is harder to unearth.”
Here we are a hundred years later and there is constant “noise” about medbeds so what do we need to understand to make the pieces fit together? Every disease has a frequency. To diagnose, there must be some “evidence” from the patient. In the early stages of his investigations, Abrams percussed the patient to find the specific resonance. As time went on, surrogates, usually healthy medical students, acted as intermediaries between the diagnostician and patient. Later still, samples from the patient, usually a drop of blood, or much later, hair, photographs, or even handwriting were used as witnesses.
For treatment, Abrams relied heavily on homeopathic remedies and his frequency devices. His work influenced doctors with different specialties, many of them eventually practicing under the general label of radionics.
Over the years, I have read dozens of books on this subject, but my goal at the moment is to build a foundation for understanding frequencies, both as health hazards and hope. In the next essay, I will take this a step further and discuss the work of Dr. Royal Rife.
Copyright by Dr. Ingrid Naiman 2023 || All Rights Reserved
Image Credit:
https://ktociewyleczy.pl/wiedza/leczenie/terapie-naturalne/2974-pole-elektromagnetyczne-czlowieka-a-biorezonans
Additional Information on Dr. Albert Abrams:
https://www.biologicalmedicineinstitute.com/albert-abrams
https://www.sueyounghistories.com/2008-10-19-albert-abrams-1863-e28093-1924/