Illnesses and Frequencies, Part 3
Microscopes
Most people — including most medical doctors — have never been exposed to, much less trained in, what some people call live blood analysis. There are many ways to approach this subject, but I will try to start with a relatively simple explanation. A microscope is just a device. It has optics that magnify the samples being viewed, and there are certain limits to the resolution depending the lenses, wavelengths, light paths, and some complex factors that we do not need to understand unless we are trying to surpass the achievements of our predecessors. Although we can enlarge and enlarge by adding a camera with a zoom, we are only making the images bigger, not revealing more.
If we accept this rather simple explanation, we can argue that Dr. Royal Rife was not only way ahead of his time, but still more or less in a league by himself. Yes, there are electron microscopes but the beam tends to create artifacts. These microscopes have a higher resolution, but they cannot be used for viewing live samples because they rely on electrons rather than light. The electrons scatter so only a black and white snapshot is possible.
Since I have spent a lot of time investigating this subject, I will try to make the possibilities and limitations as clear as possible. When viewing a live sample, the interactions between the components in the sample can be observed. If we take the time to study the interactions, we will learn a lot. I have evolved my own system and labeled myself a “blood behaviorist” because the cells are living, interactive, and, I believe, sentient.
If we go back a few centuries, microscopes were very simple. They were basically only a little more useful than magnifying glasses. There was no internal light, and this is an area where advances have been dramatic in our own lifetimes, not to mention as compared to when Dr. Rife was building microscopes. The two biggest technological developments affecting microscopy are lighting and photography. We have halogen and LED illumination as well as cameras with incredible optics, video, and zoom features. Despite all this, there have been very few “conquests” of the physics governing resolution. Many modern scopes have all kinds of whistles and bells, including computer interfaces that enable time lapsed photography and mechanical scanning, but light itself has a wavelength that poses a limit on what we can and cannot see.
It’s important to me that these technicalities do not interfere with a proper understanding of how we gather information. Thus, to explain microscopy, it might be useful to think first of astronomy. If we look at the sky during the day, we hope to see a very bright sun, blue skies, and pretty white clouds, maybe some birds and a hint of the moon. Except for dawn and dusk, we do not see Venus or stars. However, there are stars in the sky, but the brightness of the sun has rendered them invisible.
This is similar to what can be seen in a brightfield microscope, the type of scope used in most schools and laboratories.
Now, at night, we do not see the sun; but when the sky is clear, we see a dazzling display of stars along with a much more impressive moon and perhaps a few comets, meteors . . . and satellites! This is similar to what Dr. Rife saw in his microscope and what can be seen in darkfield and grayfield scopes today.
The way this is achieved is that the light beam is split so it comes in from the sides and silhouettes the objects on the slides. One can be looking at something inanimate or living, but the details that are normally washed out by the bright light are now visible, like the stars in the night sky.
The first inescapable conclusion is that blood is not sterile . . . and this is perhaps the cat the powers that be are trying to keep in the bag.
Now, we should understand two points. The first is that we have a choice of seeing in technicolor but missing objects that are washed out by bright light; or, we can look at objects against a darkfield. These would be mostly black and white, but if we fiddle a bit, we can often see some color.
This is my own photograph taken in Switzerland in 2005. The patient had a very heavy load of toxic metals with very serious health consequences that resolved once removing the amalgam fillings in her teeth. Though the white blood cells look quite impressive in this picture, they died very fast. The red blood cells, the smaller “circles”, are not in anyway near catastrophic condition, but they are not perfect by any means.
This is an image of rouleaux, a very common problem with a number of different possible causes. It is widely discussed on the Internet because it is so easily recognizable. However, the underlying problem may be as simple as dehydration or complex enough to require expert guidance. In this particular case, the red blood cells appear to be normal in shape and size, but they should not be stacked together.
The second choice we have is whether to base our observations on a “first glance” or study the movement and interactions to see what more we can learn. This is not possible with electron microscopy or when fixatives are used on smears. So, this is what is unique about live blood microscopy.
Now, what is also important to mention is that Dr. Rife built truly unique microscopes. His attention was not the same as mine. He was not a “blood behaviorist”; but his work was original and cutting edge. He was quite convinced that cancer is caused by a virus, and with his “light management” and capacity to view at 61,000x, he claimed to see the virus he believed caused cancer.
There are a couple of comments to make here. The first is that his conviction that cancer was caused by a virus led him to run experiments testing this theory in particular. The second is that darkfield microscopes as configured today are not able to reveal viruses. This requires a technical explanation of the optics, but trust me, the magnification is not sufficient so even if there is a viral component to a disease, it can only be deduced from the tissue damage. The virus itself is too small to be see. Remember, even with powerful zoom features in the camera, the magnification is “empty” meaning that what is enlarged is only what the microscope optics reveal.
The developers of the grayfield scope claim to be able to see viruses, but I have yet to accumulate the funds needed to purchase such a microscope!
This essay may seem like a digression from the subject of vibrations, but we actually need to understand the contributions of Dr. Rife in order to assess the value of many spin offs of the “Rife Machines” as well as his use of noble gases which I did not mention in the previous essay.
In a half century of study, I have met people with all manner of specializations and convictions. Dr. Rife deserves a place in history, but he actually spent about 95% of time with the microscope and only a few minutes with the treatment. This speaks partly to his own need to know as well as the power of the treatments. In today’s world, many people are producing frequency devices, everything from Hulda Clark’s Zapper to the medbeds about which we are hearing so much.
Just as we need to understand chemistry in order to understand pharmacology, we need to understand electromagnetic waves in order to understand frequency devices. Interestingly, we also need to understand thought because the mind travels much faster than light . . . and no doubt plays a very significant role in both pathology and healing.
Copyright by Dr. Ingrid Naiman 2023 || All Rights Reserved