Sometimes a story is worth pages and pages of theory. Following a lecture given at the Bioneers Conference in 2000, I received a phone call from the late Horst Rechelbacher, founder of Aveda. He had sold the company and wanted to develop an herbal line. He invited me to Wisconsin to discuss this concept. He was deluged by people seeking investments and donations for their pet projects. In short, there was a lot of traffic in his home; and it was a bit of a madhouse. At the time, I was in excruciating pain from a dental abscess; and a colleague, a dentist, had urged me not to fly because of the risk.
As fate would have it, one of the many soliciting funding for his invention arrived with a scalar device and eight trays of homeopathic remedies. The area where the discussions took place was crowded so four of the trays were put on the floor near my feet. Out of curiosity, I looked down and the abscess burst. I remember a nasty taste, but the pain resolved instantly. The infection apparently disappeared completely, and I could then concentrate better on the conversation.
Over years, people have asked me which remedy accounted for the response, but the point is that all I did was look at the trays. I never touched any of the vials and did not read the labels. There were 100 vials on each tray so who knows. The “cure” was permanent, meaning there was no recurrence and no need for medical intervention. Perhaps just as important is the fact that I had only looked at the trays to make sure my feet didn’t disturb anything. It had not occurred to me to look at the opportunity for a cure . . . at least consciously, it was not on the agenda.
The person seeking investment had a laptop computer with the frequencies programmed, but it was not booted. This was therefore similar to the recovery of the photographs discussed in the previous post in this series.
At that time, I already had considerable exposure to the subject of frequency devices. The normal way that a treatment would have been determined is perhaps best explained by a visit to a clinic in Germany. While participating in a conference in Copenhagen, a doctor invited me to Lübeck. His clinic was very well organized, and he was using a Voll electroacupuncture device to select the correct homeopathic remedy. For all intents and purposes, the trays of remedies were similar in that each tray held roughly 100 vials so the process of elimination involved a question such as, “Is the correct remedy in the trays on the left?” There might have been 10-12 trays in neatly organized drawers. The patient, or in this case, the subject, was connected to a device; and a gauge on the device provided the response to the question. If the answer was “no”, the next question might be to ask if the required remedy was in the first four trays of the drawers on the right. The point here is that this system would not work unless something in the psyche already knew where the right remedy was. Then, the question is whether it will have a vibrational effect without even dispensing the remedy?
It is really obvious that materialistic science would have every reason to scoff at this system of healing, but would their disdain and skepticism be justified?
Using the Chinese terminology, we can appreciate that qi is invisible but this does not equate to being non-existent or unmeasurable. Many years ago, I saw a TV documentary in which a surgeon said he had operated on 7000 patients and stated that he had never seen qi. I wonder how many doctors they interviewed before finding someone silly enough to say this on camera?
There are a few more parts to this series, but for today, it is sufficient to note that despite the challenges of quantifying responses, there are cases that have resolved . . . and no doubt disappointments as well. The irony of my personal experience with the homeopathic remedy is that there have been much more formal assessments and “prescriptions” that did nothing that could be noted and at least three that clearly did harm. The bottom line is perhaps that energy is very powerful, but it can be beneficial or risky so these are the subjects that will be covered in the next installments.
Copyright by Dr. Ingrid Naiman 2023 || All Rights Reserved